Difference between revisions of "Women of Eureka"

From eurekapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 1: Line 1:
 
[[File:1996.70 - Doudiet - Camping in the bush2-wiki.jpg|1000px|thumb|right|Charles A. Doudiet, '','' 1850s, pencil on paper. <br>Courtesy Art Gallery of Ballarat, purchased Purchased with funds from the Colin Hicks Caldwell Bequest, 2004.]]
 
[[File:1996.70 - Doudiet - Camping in the bush2-wiki.jpg|1000px|thumb|right|Charles A. Doudiet, '','' 1850s, pencil on paper. <br>Courtesy Art Gallery of Ballarat, purchased Purchased with funds from the Colin Hicks Caldwell Bequest, 2004.]]
  
Australian women have been systematically excluded from many narratives of nation building and they have almost disappeared from some historical accounts. The historical record has been silent on the presence of women at Eureka, and this has often been taken to indicate that women were ''absent'' and the idea of women's invisibility at Eureka has thus been propagated. It was not until Laurel Johnson wrote about the Women of Eureka that they began to stir in our national memory when discussing the Eureka Affair. But still they were not deemed as an important facet in the image of nation building nor did they dovetail with the masculinist image of the rough and tumble goldfields. Corfield, Wickham and Gervasoni included them in The Eureka Encyclopaedia<ref>Corfield, Justin, et al, ''The Eureka Encyclopeadia'', Ballarat Heritage Services, 2004.</ref>
+
Australian women have been systematically excluded from many narratives of nation building and they have almost disappeared from some historical accounts. The historical record has been silent on the presence of women at Eureka, and this has often been taken to indicate that women were ''absent'' and thus the idea of women's invisibility at Eureka has been propagated.  
 +
It was not until Laurel Johnson wrote about the Women of Eureka that they began to stir in our national memory when discussing the Eureka Affair. But still they were not deemed as an important facet in the image of nation building nor did they dovetail with the masculinist image of the rough and tumble goldfields. Corfield, Wickham and Gervasoni included them in The Eureka Encyclopaedia<ref>Corfield, Justin, et al, ''The Eureka Encyclopeadia'', Ballarat Heritage Services, 2004.</ref>
 
Women were active in the protests surrounding Eureka.<ref>Dorothy Wickham. Women in 'Ballarat' 1851-1871: A Case Study in Agency, Volume 2, PhD, School of Behavioural and Social Sciences and Humanities, University of Ballarat, March 2008.</ref> Oral and written testament places women and children not only at the scene of the fracas on 3 December 1854 at the Eureka Stockade on the Eureka Lead but also inside the Eureka Stockade.<ref>Dorothy Wickham. Women in 'Ballarat' 1851-1871: A Case Study in Agency, Volume 2, PhD, School of Behavioural and Social Sciences and Humanities, University of Ballarat, March 2008.</ref>  
 
Women were active in the protests surrounding Eureka.<ref>Dorothy Wickham. Women in 'Ballarat' 1851-1871: A Case Study in Agency, Volume 2, PhD, School of Behavioural and Social Sciences and Humanities, University of Ballarat, March 2008.</ref> Oral and written testament places women and children not only at the scene of the fracas on 3 December 1854 at the Eureka Stockade on the Eureka Lead but also inside the Eureka Stockade.<ref>Dorothy Wickham. Women in 'Ballarat' 1851-1871: A Case Study in Agency, Volume 2, PhD, School of Behavioural and Social Sciences and Humanities, University of Ballarat, March 2008.</ref>  
  

Revision as of 16:37, 22 November 2013

Charles A. Doudiet, , 1850s, pencil on paper.
Courtesy Art Gallery of Ballarat, purchased Purchased with funds from the Colin Hicks Caldwell Bequest, 2004.

Australian women have been systematically excluded from many narratives of nation building and they have almost disappeared from some historical accounts. The historical record has been silent on the presence of women at Eureka, and this has often been taken to indicate that women were absent and thus the idea of women's invisibility at Eureka has been propagated. It was not until Laurel Johnson wrote about the Women of Eureka that they began to stir in our national memory when discussing the Eureka Affair. But still they were not deemed as an important facet in the image of nation building nor did they dovetail with the masculinist image of the rough and tumble goldfields. Corfield, Wickham and Gervasoni included them in The Eureka Encyclopaedia[1] Women were active in the protests surrounding Eureka.[2] Oral and written testament places women and children not only at the scene of the fracas on 3 December 1854 at the Eureka Stockade on the Eureka Lead but also inside the Eureka Stockade.[3]


Also See

Elizabeth Abbott; Sarah Hanmer;


References

  1. Corfield, Justin, et al, The Eureka Encyclopeadia, Ballarat Heritage Services, 2004.
  2. Dorothy Wickham. Women in 'Ballarat' 1851-1871: A Case Study in Agency, Volume 2, PhD, School of Behavioural and Social Sciences and Humanities, University of Ballarat, March 2008.
  3. Dorothy Wickham. Women in 'Ballarat' 1851-1871: A Case Study in Agency, Volume 2, PhD, School of Behavioural and Social Sciences and Humanities, University of Ballarat, March 2008.