Difference between revisions of "John D'Ewes"

From eurekapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 9: Line 9:
  
 
==Post 1854 Experiences==
 
==Post 1854 Experiences==
 +
 +
 +
== In The News ==
 +
 +
:THE EUREKA STOCKADE. - TO THE EDITOR OF THE ARGUS.
 +
:Sir, – My friend Mr. Lavater makes my letter of the 17th inst. the occasion of some warmth. The name Dr. Ewes was a mis- print for Dewes or D'Ewes. I never knew  before that this officer served at Geelong.  The police officer Armstrong, mentioned by Mr. Lavater, left the public service 15  months before the outbreak ; and as early as January or February, 1854, the police – I am speaking of those at Ballarat only – were forbidden to carry any weapon but their baton. What happened at Smythsdale in  March, 1854 (see Mr. Cane's letter), I cannot say.
 +
:Mr. Bolger, another correspondent, says that at the last "digger hunt" the police carried arms, but he does not explain that this was the time when the diggers were  nightly "sniping" the Goveminent camp as admitted by Mr. Lavater, and while they held in forced imprisonment Commissioner Amos, "one of the beloved of the diggers" according to the same authority. The Eureka outbreak from every point of view, was a stupendous folly. It would be well if the whole affair could be forgotten. —
 +
:Yours, &c., J. SADLEIR.
 +
:June 23.<ref>The Argus,  24 June 1909.</ref>
  
  

Revision as of 22:03, 12 July 2013

Background

Goldfields Involvement, 1854

Police magistrate John D'Ewes.

Dewes was a witness examined during the report of the Board appointed to enquire into circumstances connected with the riot at Ballarat, and the burning of James Bentley's Eureka Hotel. [1]

Post 1854 Experiences

In The News

THE EUREKA STOCKADE. - TO THE EDITOR OF THE ARGUS.
Sir, – My friend Mr. Lavater makes my letter of the 17th inst. the occasion of some warmth. The name Dr. Ewes was a mis- print for Dewes or D'Ewes. I never knew before that this officer served at Geelong. The police officer Armstrong, mentioned by Mr. Lavater, left the public service 15 months before the outbreak ; and as early as January or February, 1854, the police – I am speaking of those at Ballarat only – were forbidden to carry any weapon but their baton. What happened at Smythsdale in March, 1854 (see Mr. Cane's letter), I cannot say.
Mr. Bolger, another correspondent, says that at the last "digger hunt" the police carried arms, but he does not explain that this was the time when the diggers were nightly "sniping" the Goveminent camp as admitted by Mr. Lavater, and while they held in forced imprisonment Commissioner Amos, "one of the beloved of the diggers" according to the same authority. The Eureka outbreak from every point of view, was a stupendous folly. It would be well if the whole affair could be forgotten. —
Yours, &c., J. SADLEIR.
June 23.[2]


See also

Further Reading

Corfield, J.,Wickham, D., & Gervasoni, C. The Eureka Encyclopaedia, Ballarat Heritage Services, 2004.


References

  1. Report of the Board appointed to Enquire into Circumstances Connected with the Late Disturbance at Ballarat, John Ferres, Government Printer, Melbourne, 21 November 1854.
  2. The Argus, 24 June 1909.

External links



File:File name.jpg
Caption, Reference.